Kin Lane offers insightful commentary on what went wrong with the open data movement, and why it failed to live up to initial exuberance and expectations.
Particularly pointed are his comments on open data portals, which haven't innovated much on user experience since the first iterations created by private and nonprofit organizations. Kin doesn't talk about the poor experience of data portals, but I think a substantive part of this failure is open data movement's inability to capture the imagination and interest of the design community.
"Today, there are plenty of open data portals," writes Kin. "The growth in the number of portals hasn’t decreased, but I’d say the popularity, utility, and publicity around open data efforts have not lived up to the hype."
Secondarily, a truly sustainable, open community of open data leaders never materialized. Harvard's Civic Analytics Network and GovEx are available, but largely inaccessible to the broader community.
Kin's opinions are a little more anti-entrepreneurial and punk rock than mine, but it's hard to have experienced the energy of bright technologists at the early stages of the open data movement and -- seeing where it stands today -- not think it's all now extremely incremental in realizing its true potential.
Hopefully, those who consider themselves open data leaders will take the time to meditate on Kin's thoughts and use them to reinvigorate the next iteration of the movement.
Read more: Why the Open Data Movement Has Not Delivered as Expected