Original post: Developing a Web 2.0 strategy for local government
Following on from my earlier post about local government and Web 2.0, I would like to discuss in more detail about forming a strategy for implementing Web 2.0 in local government.
The two main factors to be discussed and agreed upon are what channels you will use, and what you intend to use them for.
However, more importantly, there needs to be a clear understanding of ‘why’ social media is being implemented. Without a clear appreciation of the benefits and uses of social media, any proposed strategy for its use will fail. What demographic group(s) are you trying to reach, and what do want to tell them?
As mentioned in my earlier post, social media gives local governments a very good vehicle in which to engage with harder to reach demographic groups, such as teenagers and young adults. It can give citizens a voice in decisions that affect their local communities. Social media can provide a two way communication channel, allowing citizens to be both informed (listen), and to have their say (talk). Social media presents local councils with unique opportunities that should be fully utilised.
Different social media channels work better than others for particular types of communication. For providing an ‘online community’, Facebook / MySpace may be suitable channels. For quick updates in real time, Twitter may be a more suitable channel. There are no rules, and each channel has its own particular set of advantages and disadvantages. Each social media channel should be used to its own particular strengths.
To summarise, any strategy for implementing Web 2.0 within local government should include answers to the following questions:
- What do you want to achieve with social media? Why are you using it?
- What social media channels will you use?
- What do you want to use these channels for?
- What resources do you have? Who will provide the content, who will post the replies, who will moderate the comments and so on.